Content integrity
1. Material claims are sourced. Facts that affect a reader's decision point to an appropriate source.
2. Sources fit the claim. Primary and current sources are used where specifications, policies, prices, or rules may change.
3. Uncertainty is visible. Estimates, limitations, and inferences are labeled instead of presented as tested facts.
Reader usefulness
4. One decision is clear. The page serves a specific reader, problem, and next decision.
5. Structure supports scanning. Headings, tables, and summaries help readers compare without hiding important conditions.
6. The recommendation has boundaries. Who should choose it, who should not, and why are explicit.
Technical completion
7. Title and description match the page. They are specific, readable, and do not promise content that is absent.
8. Links have a job. Internal links continue the task; external links support claims; broken and placeholder links are removed.
9. Images are useful and accessible. Relevant images load, have descriptive alternative text, and do not contain misleading details.
10. Mobile layout is checked. Text, tables, navigation, and commands remain readable and usable on a narrow screen.
Live verification
11. The exact public URL is verified. Check the canonical page, not only a preview or successful upload response.
12. A refresh trigger is recorded. Note which claims can age, who owns the page, and what evidence should trigger an update.
Completion rule: a checked box means the public result was observed or the evidence was recorded. It does not mean the upload command returned success.